An attempt to repeal, replace Clean Water Rule

Print Article

The Environmental Protection Agency has formally began the process to withdraw the Clean Water Rule, as prescribed by executive order. Meetings among the EPA, governors, and other state and local environmental regulators have begun.

The issuance of a draft rule of repeal is only the first phase to withdraw and replace the 2015 Clean Water Rule. Before the rule can be rescinded, there must be a review of the rule, a public comment period, and justification for repeal as demonstrated through law and scientific evidence. Additional time will be required to draft and review any new definitions and rules brought forth by the EPA.

As written, the Clean Water Rule, also referred to as the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) Rule, seeks to protect streams and wetlands that provide water for drinking, farming, industry, and recreation.

The rule defines protected bodies of water and retains existing exemptions from groundwater regulation and for normal farming and ranching practices like planting, harvesting, and moving livestock.

Ultimately, the Trump Administration seeks to only protect waterways that are “relatively permanent,” a narrower definition than guides the existing rule.

Due to a stay of the rule in the district court system, the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers have continued to operate under 1986 regulation and subsequent guidance documents to provide definition.

Much of the opposition to the Clean Water Rule stems from a concern of government over-regulation that was promulgated through the farm and ranch communities during the original rules process.

Rasmusssen represents the Center For Rural Affairs, private, a non-profit organization working to strengthen small businesses, family farms and ranches, and rural communities through action oriented programs addressing social, economic, and environmental issues.

Print Article

Read More Letters to the Editor

Iceland has very strict requirements

November 15, 2017 at 6:00 am | Priest River Times Here is a letter to the editor “on the lighter side.” I see in the paper many articles about the so called smelter plant coming to Pend Oreille County. Many people are opposed to it, many favor bec...

Comments

Read More

Too much to lose with smelter gamble

November 08, 2017 at 6:00 am | Priest River Times How would you like a smelter in your backyard (Sandpoint will be downwind)? That is the question that people in the Blanchard/Newport/Priest River area are wrestling with right now. I have been to se...

Comments

Read More

Board should interview HiTest neighbors

November 01, 2017 at 6:00 am | Priest River Times Bad news: A silicon smelter may be your neighbor. The Good news: Pend Oreille County commissioners didn’t entertain welcoming a rendering plant. Commissioners plan to visit the HiTest plant in Missi...

Comments

Read More

‘King Kren’ strikes again!

November 01, 2017 at 6:00 am | Priest River Times During a depressing conversation with my daughter last night I learned the kids attending PRLHS will not be allowed to dress up for Halloween. This announcement was made to the students during the la...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(208) 448-2431
P.O. Box 159
310 Church Street
Sandpoint Idaho 83864

©2017 Priest River Times Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X
X